The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean Island between 2010 and 2017

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean Island between 2010 and 2017.

The graph below indicates the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean Island between 2010 and 2017.

The graph describes figures are divided into 3 types: visitors staying on cruise ships, visitors staying on Island and total. As shown in the first figures almost few visitors come Island for staying cryise ships in 2010. Then these point rose slowly following years. So visitor's number is sufficed 1million in2014. After this type grown gradually until 2017.
The second line visitors staying on Island. So this line begin aroun 1 millions and did not alter during one year. Visitors of number increased slightly untill 2013 years. Afterwards this line did not show modification. The shape decreased slowly in 2016. The figures reached a high point in 2012 at last decreased. The total view as can be seen from the graph starting point was 1 million.
This line gradual increased since 2011. According to figures peaked a high point in 2017 as 3,5 millions of tourists.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-14 soomi2209 61 view
2024-03-11 MinyiChu 67 view
2024-02-04 Saul 67 view
2024-01-14 Ahmad_off 67 view
2024-01-14 Ahmad_off 67 view
Essays by user Bibidona :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ors number is sufficed 1million in2014. After this type grown gradually until 2017. ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...7. The second line visitors staying on Island. So this line begin aroun 1 milli...
^^
Line 4, column 318, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...a high point in 2012 at last decreased. The total view as can be seen from the grap...
^^^
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...igures peaked a high point in 2017 as 3,5 millions of tourists.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06134969325 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35235876938 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644171779141 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 10.0 22.4926829268 44% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.376251945 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 55.0 112.824112599 49% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.8666666667 22.9334400587 47% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289079447399 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949871456461 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.203560150402 0.0843802449381 241% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27226692861 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.333507556385 0.0819641961636 407% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.2329268293 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.25 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.88 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 11.4329268293 39% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.9970731707 55% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.