The graph below shows the percentage of the Australian workforce in five industries between 1962 and 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph demonstrates the percentages of some different industries of the Australian workforce from 1962 to 2012.
Overall, the figures for construction and mining saw a gradual increase. While the percentages of services experienced an upward trend, the data for manufacturing, agriculture saw a decline. Units in the essay are measured at percentages.
Regarding to the data of services experienced an increase in over 60 years. It began with just over a half in 1962, before climbing up to just under 80 in 2012. The figures of mining seemed unchanged, it stayed at 10 in over 60 years. Likewise, the percentages of mining stayed at just over 1 in 1962, then a slight climb to just over 5 in 1982, before going down to over 1 in 2012.
On the other hand, the figures of manufacturing saw a decline to approximately 10 in 2012. It began with just over a one-fourth in 1962, before reducing steadily to over 10 in next 60 years. Finally, the proportion of agriculture underwent a drop through 60 years. It started at over a one-tenth in 1962, before decreasing to just under 5 in 2012.
- The graph below shows the production levels of the main kinds of fuel in the UK between 1981 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below give information about different types of waste disposed of in one country in 1960 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, likewise, regarding, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73821989529 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00921895194 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465968586387 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.7805913216 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.4166666667 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9166666667 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110638344609 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489123262301 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772984952227 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105866714052 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107017290658 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.