The graph below shows the percentage of people in the different age groups who went to the cinema once a month in Great Britain.
The line graph illustrates the proportion of cinema-goers in four different age ranges in Great Britain who went to the cinemas once a month between 1984 and 2000.
Overall, the number of cinema visitors in four age groups increased during the period given. Strikingly, filmgoers aged between 15 and 24 visited cinemas most frequently, while people aged 35 or over rarely go to the cinemas.
Starting at just under 20% in 1984, the proportion of filmgoers in the youngest age group increased considerably to 40% in 1994. Similarly, there was an uptrend in the data of people in the 7-14 and 25-35 age groups which climbed to around 30% and 25% respectively. Meanwhile, the figure for cinema visitors aged 35 or older recorded a slight growth of 5% in 1994.
After 1994, the proportion of cinema-goers aged 7-14 continued to rose and reached a peak at 55% in 1999. Likewise, the data of people in the 35 and over age group also experienced a significant rise of 10% in 2000. In contrast, after reaching the peak at around 38% in 1999, the percentage of the youngest group decreased sharply to just over 30% in one year, whereas the figure for people aged between 25 and 35 stabilized at 35% during 5 years followed by a rise to around 22% in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-24 | thaocbh | 82 | view |
| 2023-01-24 | thaocbh | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-22 | thanhnga285 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-22 | thanhnga285 | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-28 | Han Duyen | 73 | view |
- The chart below gives information about the age of women in Australia when they gave birth to their first child in 1966 1986 and 2006 73
- In some countries men and women are having children late in life What are the reasons for this development Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages 73
- some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Other argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give opinions 67
- These days people in some countries are living in a throw away society which means people use things in a short time and then throw them away What are the Causes of this and what problems can this cause 84
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, similarly, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69230769231 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67684444859 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52036199095 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0272957799 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.222222222 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318583284454 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138637127859 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110585987273 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224074782347 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128725848194 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.