the graph below shows the percentage of people of different age group who went cinema once a moth in Great Britain. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown.
The line graph illustrates the proportion of different aged group of people who went to cinema once a month in Great Britain, over a sixteen- year period, between 1984 and 2000.
It is clear from the graph that all group of ages experienced a tremendous growth in the percentage. In addition, the ratio of people aged 7 to 14 and 25 to 35 experienced the same features as they both accounted for around 30% in 2020.
From 1984 to 1994, albeit the proportion of people aged 7 to 35 saw a steady fluctuation, it rose dramatically. Moreover, in 1994, the ratio of people aged 7 to 14 accounted for 50%, which meant that it saw the highest proportion of people coming to theater once a month at that t. If we look at the percentage of people aged 35 to over the hill, it maintained the same level to somewhere in the vicinity of 5%.
From 1994 to 2000, the percentage of people of all ages increased slightly due to the marked fluctuation. In addition, in 2020, the proportion of people aged 15 to 24 reached a peak of approximately 55%.
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In some countries people waste a lot of food which is bought in shops and restaurants What do you think are the reasons What can be done to solve this problem 67
- the graph below shows the percentage of people of different age group who went cinema once a moth in Great Britain Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown 39
- Research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison commit crimes when set free What are the reasons What can be done to solve the problem 56
- The chart below show how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 10
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'reached' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'reaches'.
Suggestion: reaches
... the proportion of people aged 15 to 24 reached a peak of approximately 55%.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46073298429 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77022232678 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497382198953 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9285218254 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265245525303 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121725979898 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799978258622 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178254744612 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860959677876 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.