The graph below shows the percentage of population in cities since 1970s with projection to 2030.
Given is the graph illustrating the changes in city population in four different countries between 1970 and 2030.
It is clear from the graph that the trend in all countries generally increases during the examined period. Remarkably, the Chinese population is expected to rise significantly into the foreseeable future.
In 1970, there was a big difference in the number of residents between the USA, Korea, China and India, with the highest percentage of 70% in the USA, the figure for Korea was considerably lower, at 40%, while China and India made up only 20%. Until the 1990s, the percentage of an alteration in city dwellers in the USA, Korea, and India continued a stable climb with slight acceleration, however, China still remained unchanged.
After flattening out in 20 year's time, Chinese citizens received appreciable acceleration to 60% in 2010, which was threefold compared to its previous time. In the next 20 years, the proportion of residents in India is predicted to be the lowest of the total group, at about 39%, while Americans and Korean will jump further to peak at 90%. At the same time, the Chinese population followed by a period of stability which will be nearly 70%.
- High school students are usually not good at managing money What are the reasons What are the solutions 78
- The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 79
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The table below shows the result of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club think about the club s activities facilities and opening hours Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make any comparisons wher 52
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the frog. 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, still, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77459907014 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5630911062 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141550030309 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650994985622 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647417710106 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992936867628 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071175777728 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.