The graph below shows the percentage of population in cities since 1970s with projection to 2030.
The line graph illustrates the number of people in urban areas in four specific countries namely: USA, Korean, China and India from 1970 to 2030.
Overall, it is clear that the proportion of population in the USA was the highest throughout the period shown. In addition, the figures for other three countries also increase over 60 years.
In 1970, the figure of population in city in the USA was highest at 70%, while the rate of population in Korean was significantly lower, at 40%. Meanwhile, only 20% of people who accomodated in cities in China and India. In 2000, the percentage of population in Korean and America rose gradually to approximately 85%. Moreover, the data of people who lived in urban areas in China and India increased to 32% and 50%, respectively.
In 2030, it is predicted that the proportion for the USA and Korea will reach nearly 100% and become the highest compared to other countries. The population in cities in China is expected to rise to just under 60%. In contrast, the figure of population in India will remain stable in the same period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-04 | dataimielts | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-02 | thanhzjzj | 82 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | adamneyul | 42 | view |
| 2020-05-11 | thiên định | view | |
| 2020-05-11 | thiên định | view |
- The graph below shows the percentage of population in cities since 1970s with projection to 2030 61
- Essay topics The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant https www testbig c 11
- Both governments and individuals are spending vast amounts of money protecting animals and their habitat This money could be better spent dealing with fundamental issue in society such as poverty and health care To what extent do you agree 95
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Many elderly people are no longer looked after by their families but are put in care or nursing homes What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79032258065 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67115582078 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52688172043 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.6204634284 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15027325076 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613652390403 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405243147962 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0873093109576 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034926922293 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.