The pie charts below give information about world population in 1990 and in 2000
The pie charts reveal factual data about the population in several regions around the world in two specific years: 1990 and 2000.
Overall, it is clear that the proportion of Asia’s population was the highest and other unnamed places accounted for just a small percentage in both pictures. In addition, the data for Middle East and North Africa has just appeared in 2000.
As can be seen from the charts, Asia has the highest number of inhabitants, which was 60%, followed by Europe(including Russia) at 25%, in 1990. Over the next ten years, the figure for Asia Pacific(including former Soviet Asia) and Europe(including Russia) both dropped to about 55% and 15%, respectively. In contrast, the population in Africa and Latin America nearly doubled over the next ten years, with the numbers climbing to 10% and 8%.
As the charts show, in 2000, a new data for Middle East and North Africa was revealed, which was 6%. Moreover, the number of population in North America and others country both witnessed a stability, which precisely lower than 6%, in 2000.
- The pie charts below give information about world population in 1990 and in 2000 79
- The nuclear family is well adapted to move geographically due to its size Do you think children benefit in any way from moving Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Both governments and individuals are spending vast amounts of money protecting animals and their habitat This money could be better spent dealing with fundamental issue in society such as poverty and health care To what extent do you agree 95
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 78
- THE REASON THAT MOST INDIVIDUALS ARE IN DEBITS IS DUE TO THE OVERUSE AS WELL AS IRRESPONSIBLE USE OF CREDIT CARDS BANKS SHOULD NOT ISSUE CREDIT CARDS UNLESS THEY ARE COMPLETELY SURE OF AN INDIVIDUAL S ABILITY TO PAY BACK THEIR DEBITS 49
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 20, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bing to 10% and 8%. As the charts show, in 2000, a new data for Middle East and ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94382022472 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72749192862 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573033707865 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.154211874 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208205441948 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975701548985 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112754245016 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158396798256 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136385724015 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.