The map below gives information about a school in 2004 and the change of the same school in 2010.
The pictures compare the difference of the facilities of Hogwards Grammar School in 2004 and in 2010.
Overall, it is clear that there were many developments has been made to the school. Besides some new features, the main change is that there were more buildings that were able to accomodate more students.
Looking at the first picture, there was only one school building connected to the Sport field by a walking path. On the left hand side of the sport center, there was a main road that lead to the car park which located in the west. In addition, the school could only hold for about 600 students in 2004.
Over the next four years, the school has experienced some remarkable changes to its features. Firstly, the sport field became smaller due to the construction of two school buildings on the right and the top of it. Additionally, the walking path was also relocated, which then connected 3 school buildings together. More than that,another car park has been built opposite to the old one and the main road has become U-shape. As a result, the school was expected to admit for around 1000 students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 329, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , another
...chool buildings together. More than that,another car park has been built opposite to the...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, look, so, then, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74226804124 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49397190129 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572164948454 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.2593249439 43.030603864 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.6363636364 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242819397283 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100831142684 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733718408583 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158601787247 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523009893622 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.