The graph below shows the percentage of workers from five different European countries that were absent for a day or more due to illness from 1991 to 2001 Summarise the information by selecting reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva

Essay topics:

: The graph below shows the percentage of workers from five different European countries that were absent for a day or more due to illness from 1991 to 2001.Summarise the information by selecting reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The gragh given compares five distinct nations in Europe in terms of the proportion of employees absent for a day or more as they endured from illness from 1991 to 2001.
It is clear from the graph that during the research period, workers in Netherlands were prone to be off. Additionally, all the figures in the graph experienced instabilities
In 1991, the share of France was highest, at exactly 5%, compared to only approximately 4.9% of the employees in Netherlands absent. Meanwhile, the figures for Sweden and the UK accounted for about 3% and over 2 % of the total in turn. By contrast, the proportion of Germany was nearly 2.5 times as low as that of France.
In 2000, there was a fluctuation in the rate of Netherlands, while it increased steadily to 5.5% and became the peak of the graph in 2001. By contrast, the percentage of France experienced a slow decline to 3%, at which point it remained unchanged in 2001. At the same time, Sweden witnessed a substantial growth to around 5 % in the share of absent workers. Meanwhile, the proportions of the

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-21 2xhptaljahy 60 view
2023-03-14 ABCDE 78 view
2023-02-15 lengan2013 84 view
2023-02-15 lengan2013 67 view
2023-02-13 Tea milk 67 view
Essays by user ABCDE :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...n of employees absent for a day or more as they endured from illness from 1991 to ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71505376344 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87475765113 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575268817204 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0670472193 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4444444444 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.555555555556 5.23603664747 11% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225577213443 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772163822244 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854151987244 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14171184289 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892319220641 0.0819641961636 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.