The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The number of people living in India and China between 2000 and 2020 with the prediction for 2050 are given in the line graph. The data is measured in billions. The population can be grouped into past recorded data and future forecasts. Over all, it can be clearly seen that India's figure is expected to rise while China's figure is expected to decrease slightly by the end of 2050.
To begin with the figures in the past, in 2000, China's population started at 1250 before increased gradually to around 1420 at 2020. Similarly, there was a dramatical growth in people who living in India from 2000 to 2020, which had the number of change around 320. Even though China's figure had the number of increasing fewer than India's figure, the number of population in China still remain higher than India's people throughout in the past.
Turning to the projected changes for 2050, the population in China is forecast to remain roughly stable between 2020 and 2030 at around 1440. After that, in 2030, there is the prediction that China's population will decline minimally at 1440 to the end of the period. On the other hand, it is expected that there will be a sharp rise in India's population from 2020 at around 1320 before it will meet the same number of population with China's figure at 1440 in 2030. Then, there is a projection that India's figure will continue to rise significantly to reach the peak at 1600 by the end of 2050.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Kien Vu | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | cindycornelia98 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | ngothithunguyet | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | Nehaa Sharma | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | lordwind | 84 | view |
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009. 84
- The bar chart shows the percentage of children who participated in different activities in their leisure time in the UK in 2014. 67
- The graph below shows average house prices in four Massachusetts towns from 1988 to 2002 (in US dollars.)Summarize the information selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Some parents buy their children a large number of toy to play with.What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys ? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...raph. The data is measured in billions. The population can be grouped into past rec...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, still, then, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1175.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6442687747 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33214309293 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474308300395 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0745108446 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.818181818 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 5.23603664747 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245757376969 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106975677144 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500148515191 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182912785851 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015880568035 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.