The graph below shows average house prices in four Massachusetts towns from 1988 to 2002 (in US dollars.)
Summarize the information selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The house prices average of four towns in Massachusetts between 1988 and 2002 is given in the line graph. The figures are measured in US dollars. The data can be grouped into two towns which had a dramatic increase in prices and those that only had a modest rise. Overall, it can be clearly seen that by the end of the period, all figures fell down excepted for Cambridge’s figure.
To begin, the figure started about 220,000 in both Cambridge and Duxbury’s figure in 1988. Then, there was a gradual fluctuation around 250,000 from 1988 to 1995 in both towns. After that, Cambridge’s figure rose significantly, in 1995, to reach a peak of roughly 580,000 in 2002 which continued to do so. In contrast, Duxbury’s figure increased sharply between 1995 and 2001 from 220,000 to 420,000 before there was an unfortunated drop in 2001 until the end of 2002.
On the other hand, from 1988 to 1995, there was a slight fluctuation around 150,000 in Framingham and Milford’s figures before both figures climbed minimally to 280,000 and 240,000 in Framingham and Milford respectively. Finally, there was a steady decline in 2001 in both towns throughout the period.
- The bar chart shows the percentage of children who participated in different activities in their leisure time in the UK in 2014. 67
- These days many countries provide free university education for all citizens, even though the cost of doing this is very high. What are the main benefits of free university education and are there any drawbacks ?Give reasons for your answer and include ex 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree of disagree with this statement ? 73
- In spite of the advance made in agriculture, many people in the world still go hungry.What is this the case? What can be done about this problem ? 73
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...The figures are measured in US dollars. The data can be grouped into two towns whic...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, then, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03045685279 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95990017472 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573604060914 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.5279301022 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137055771201 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774527244735 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103630778795 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10458958446 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075130617717 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.