The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph illustrates how many people living in China and India and how they will change in the future since 2000 to 2050.
Overall, It is clear that China’s population density was higher than India, however it is predicted to fall over the period, while the population growth in India will remain much higher.
Looking at the line graph, we can see that, in 2000, there were many people living in China than India, specifically citizen of China was 1.26 billion while there was about 1.0 billion people in India. After ten years, the amount of people in India grew up drammatically at about 1.19 billion and Chinese rose at appriximately 1.36 billion in 2010.
Following this period, in 2030, it is predicted that population growth in India will witness a rapid increase of 0,26 billion and reach it peak at 1.6 billiion in 2050. By contrast, the number of people in China is predicted to reach its top at around 1.445 billion and then it will go down steadily at about 1.39 billion at the same period.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-04 | Lily Ha | 84 | view |
2023-08-19 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 10 | view |
2023-08-19 | bemoichoianhyeuem | view | |
2023-08-18 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 78 | view |
2023-07-07 | qaptpa | view |
- The graph below shows the number of library books read by boys and girls at Starmouth School from 2009 to 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 140, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'peaks'?
Suggestion: peaks
...d increase of 0,26 billion and reach it peak at 1.6 billiion in 2050. By contrast, t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67777777778 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33547520741 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 23.1444737825 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 140.333333333 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187364321565 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110157668087 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057856777577 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131921862168 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399182561727 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.