The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares India and China in terms of the number of residents from 2000 to the present time and a projection to 2050
In general, the population in China has exceeded the others up to today but will not remain its position due to the more notable growth in the Indian. A crossing point is predicted to be shown in 2030
In details, commencing with nearly 1.3 billions in 2000, the number of people living in China was about 300 millions as many as that of India. The data is likely to reach the peak of over 1.4 billions soon in 2025. At the same period, the number of people residing in India witnessed an exponetial increase, which is estimated to gradually narrow down the difference with that of China.
From year 2030 onwards will record a continual rise in the population of India to exactly 1.6 billions people, while China is thought to show a dip in its data.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-04 | Lily Ha | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 10 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | bemoichoianhyeuem | view | |
| 2023-08-18 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | qaptpa | view |
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 732.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51851851852 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36715316651 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604938271605 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.3092965855 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.4 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203695532721 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958740605069 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715344683602 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123711167135 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323897817655 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.38 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.53 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.