The graph below shows the portion of four different materials that were recycled form 1982 to 2010 in particular country

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the portion of four different materials that were recycled form 1982 to 2010 in particular country.

The given graph illustrate the recycle scale of 4 different elements between 28 years.
overall, it can be seen that the usage of paper and cardboard, Glass containers, Aluminium and plastics is changed with the respect of time and ups and downs can be seen in all 4 material.
The reproducting rates of paper and cardboard was almost stable in during first eight years and then a rise of 18% can be seen in next 5 years but significant fall can be seen till ending years on the other hand glass containers has fall a bit in first quad of time but at the end of the period paper and glass were at the same point.
Aluminium cans are the most recycle product in all four mentioned in the start 1982 it was zero but the segnificant rise can be seen 2008 it rise up to fourty times than before, how ever plastic remains the same throughout the period and no changes can be seen.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-03-11 samandarkumar 73 view
2019-09-04 Anand9526 78 view
2019-09-04 Anand9526 56 view
Essays by user samandarkumar :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...4 different elements between 28 years. overall, it can be seen that the usage of paper...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... was almost stable in during first eight years and then a rise of 18% can be seen...
^^
Line 4, column 142, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rises'?
Suggestion: rises
...he segnificant rise can be seen 2008 it rise up to fourty times than before, how eve...
^^^^
Line 4, column 179, Rule ID: HOW_EVER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'however'?
Suggestion: however
...it rise up to fourty times than before, how ever plastic remains the same throughout the...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, then, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 714.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.32727272727 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32774616397 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581818181818 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.4926829268 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.0067932275 43.030603864 214% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 178.5 112.824112599 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.25 22.9334400587 180% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0650887106615 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566608722917 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05706227415 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0566608722917 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05706227415 0.0819641961636 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.2329268293 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.7 10.3012195122 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.72 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.9970731707 167% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.