The graph below shows the production levels of the main kinds of fuel in the UK between 1981 and 2000.
The line chart illustrates the manufacturing scale of major fuels in the UK from 1981 to 2000.
Overall, it is clear that except for the reduction in the figure for coal, that of petroleum and natural gas experienced significant increases. Besides, the increment of natural gas is stable, helping it reached the second highest figure at the end of the period despite starting at the lowest. Meanwhile, although a remarkable decline was recorded in the data of petroleum and coal, the production level of petroleum still remained the highest thoughout the timeframe shown while that of coal finished at the lowest position.
In 1981, fuel manufacturers in the UK produced around 90 energy units of petroleum, which was about 10 and 50 units higher than that of coal and natural gas respectively. In the next five years, they increased the figure for petroleum substantially, which made it hit a peak of 140 from 1984 to 1987 before decreasing to 100 in 1991. However, the maufacturing levels of coal reached a bottom of about 39 unit in 1984 and those of natural gas remained nearly unchanged in the former half of the given period.
In the remaining years, despite some minor fluctuations, there was a gradual growth in the figures for petroleum with 140 energy units being generated from this fuel in 2000. Similarly, natural gas witnessed a continual incline to reached its peak of over 100 while a contrasting pattern was true for coal as only over 30 energy units were produced from this fuel in the final year of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-03 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The bar chart shows expectations for change of European young people in the next 20 years in five different areas Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table below shows the percentage of adults in urban and rural areas who took part in four free time activities in 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information and compare where relevant by selecting and reporting the key features You should write at least 88
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, second, similarly, so, still, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87404580153 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7220270514 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522900763359 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.4418753156 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.888888889 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1111111111 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106604371343 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552000244876 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644116308377 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0933339663981 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703234881981 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.