The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.
The chart below illustrates the proportion of four different materials that were recycled in a particular nation from year 1982 to 2010.
It can be seen from the chart that, paper and cardboard significantly climbed up by 80% in year 1994 and later on it was declined about 10% by 2010.while, glass containers slightly fluctuated in between 1986 and 1990, but slowly it was escalating by 60%.
Prior to recycled materials aluminium cans were dramatically rose up Friday 5% to 45% and it was third highest material. whereas, plastic materials recycled as remained stable percent from 1886 to early 2010. It was a least recycled material as compared to others.
Overall, peoples from a nation majority preferred recycle materials were glass containers and aluminium cans went up until the year 2010 and other remaining materials were diminishing down in terms of percentage.
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 56
- University students often focus on one subject However some people think that universities should encourage students to learn a range of other subjects To what extent do you agree or disagree 63
- Many people are afraid to leave their home because of crime. Some believe that more action should be taken to prevent crime. While others feel that little action can be done to stop crime. What is your view? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...6 and 1990, but slowly it was escalating by 60%. Prior to recycled materials a...
^^
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...erials aluminium cans were dramatically rose up Friday 5% to 45% and it was third hi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
... 45% and it was third highest material. whereas, plastic materials recycled as remained...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 740.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 142.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21126760563 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45201032557 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82558520657 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633802816901 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.2276839294 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377811873541 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.218478654293 0.103423049105 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18513957058 0.0843802449381 219% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27478900904 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.208216053604 0.0819641961636 254% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.