The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982-2010 in a particular country.
The given graph represents the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Overall, it can be seen that the highest recycling rate was of paper and cardboard whereas the lowest was of plastics from the year 1982 to 2010.In the year 1982, 65% of paper and cardboard were recycled which reached to 70% in 1996 then reduced by 5% in 1990 which increased and reached the peak value of 80% in 1994. After that, slowly it decreased by 2%, 3%,4% and 5% in the year 1998, 2002, 2006 and 2010 respectively. Similarly, 50% of glass containers were recycled in 1982, declined by 5% and 10% in 1986 and 1990 respectively. Then, it gradually increased and reached to 60% in the year 2010. In 1986, only 5% aluminium cans were recycled but it sharply rose to 45% in the year 2010 which followed increasing trend At last, less percentage that is 2% plastics started to be recycled in 1990 which reached to 5% in 1994 and remained steady in the year 1998 and 2002 then slowly it was increased and reached to 10% in 2010.
- A large number of deaths are caused by road accidents why do so many road accidents occur Make recommendations that could help to reduce their number 56
- The graph below shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012 67
- Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a students performance Continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages If these are not taught many are at risk of dying out In your opinion is it important for everyone to learn English Should we try to ensure the survival of local lang 67
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... of plastics from the year 1982 to 2010.In the year 1982, 65% of paper and cardboa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50259067358 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49377328671 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502590673575 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.804851811 43.030603864 246% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 144.833333333 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1666666667 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295955947706 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188752783708 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.20958136231 0.0843802449381 248% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295955947706 0.15604864568 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.84 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.