The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features,
and make comparisons where relevant
The line graph illustrates the percentage of four materials, including paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminum cans, and plastics that were reused in a country from 1982 to 2010.
Overall, there were clear changes in the proportion of recycled materials throughout the period. There was a fluctuation in the amount of paper and cardboard, and glass containers, while the percentage of aluminum cans that were recycled experienced an upward trend from about 1996 to 2010. Moreover, the recycling rates for plastics remained unchanged.
In 1994, paper and cardboard had the highest recycling rates, with 80%, a quarter higher than the figures in 1982 and 1990. Also for glass containers, it witnessed the second highest in the last period, with 60%, which was a fifth more than the percentages of glass containers rates in 1990.
While aluminum cans were recycled at a rate of 5% in 1986, they reached a peak of 35% in 2010, which was 7 times higher than in 1986. On the contrary, almost none of plastics was recycled in 1990, it increased gradually to nearly 10% in 2010.
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 84
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 78
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rates for plastics remained unchanged. In 1994, paper and cardboard had the hig...
^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...gher than the figures in 1982 and 1990. Also for glass containers, it witnessed the ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ges of glass containers rates in 1990. While aluminum cans were recycled at a r...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, second, so, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98895027624 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68353637569 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541436464088 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8631543403 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.875 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172864065469 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859125970918 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595156081591 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119650670804 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629749219461 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rates for plastics remained unchanged. In 1994, paper and cardboard had the hig...
^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...gher than the figures in 1982 and 1990. Also for glass containers, it witnessed the ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ges of glass containers rates in 1990. While aluminum cans were recycled at a r...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, second, so, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98895027624 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68353637569 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541436464088 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8631543403 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.875 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172864065469 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859125970918 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595156081591 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119650670804 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629749219461 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.