Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
It is widely believed that governments should build railways instead of making roads by using the urban's money. In my opinion, I totally disagree with this proposal because there are a great deal of advantages to spending money on roads.
The reason why I disagree is that roads are very suitable for people. There are many means of transportations on the road such as cars and motorbikes, it takes less time for people to travel from one place to another destination. For example, we always use a car to drive to work rather than taking a train to work. My second point is that it would benefit the farmers to deliver food to the market. Because most markets tend to use the organic products which are grown in the fields, farmers will drive a truck of vegetables to the market. If they used the trains on the railways, it might affect the food quality. Therefore, investing in making roads will also help to boost the country's industry.
Advocates of spending money in railways believe that it can be effective in traveling long distances safely. In fact, trains and railways are repaired frequently to prevent accidents during the trip. However, although those are repaired, there may be problems on the trip. To most people, traveling on the road would be more safe and sound due to the fact that the roads are flatten and easy when driving. Moreover, GPS is involved in most vehicles so they will not get lost while traveling. Therefore, putting money into railways is not an ideal way as roads are more common for people and it reduces accidents.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that roads investment is more beneficial than railways because it is suitable for most people and low-risk when going.
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 56
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 73
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The graph gives information about the consumption of fast food in grams per week in the UK from 1970 to 1990 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deals'?
Suggestion: deals
...this proposal because there are a great deal of advantages to spending money on road...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...antages to spending money on roads. The reason why I disagree is that roads ...
^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'flattened'.
Suggestion: flattened
...ound due to the fact that the roads are flatten and easy when driving. Moreover, GPS is...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'roads'' or 'road's'?
Suggestion: roads'; road's
... In conclusion, I strongly believe that roads investment is more beneficial than rail...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80405405405 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51917409681 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560810810811 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5963284357 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.875 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169759755495 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551210448963 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489933520778 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11245178359 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425253077603 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deals'?
Suggestion: deals
...this proposal because there are a great deal of advantages to spending money on road...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...antages to spending money on roads. The reason why I disagree is that roads ...
^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'flattened'.
Suggestion: flattened
...ound due to the fact that the roads are flatten and easy when driving. Moreover, GPS is...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'roads'' or 'road's'?
Suggestion: roads'; road's
... In conclusion, I strongly believe that roads investment is more beneficial than rail...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80405405405 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51917409681 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560810810811 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5963284357 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.875 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169759755495 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551210448963 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489933520778 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11245178359 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425253077603 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.