The line graph compares the percentages for those aged 65 and over for three different countries from 1940 to today and predictions until 2040.
To begin with, it can be clearly seen that in between three given countries, Japan had the least 65 and over age group in 1940, despite showing a slight decrement it reached the same level as beginning in 2000. After that, it is predicted that it will rise substantially, and between 2020 and 2040 it will grow sharply to over 25%.
To continue with, when it comes to the proportion of the population in Sweden and the USA, although they started at different percentages, the same changes were observed in the first 60 years of the given period of time. After that while, the USA remained constant for around 20 years at 15%, whilst Sweden grew substantially in the same period to 20%. Later, it is forecasted that both countries will reach just under 25% by 2040.
In conclusion, even though some fluctuations between Sweden and USA, they mostly have the same patterns, whereas Japan started from the lowest ratio, nevertheless it will pass those other two countries.
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 61
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meatin a European country between 1979 and 2004
- The chart below show the percentage of whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000 will projection till 2050 73
- WATER CONSUMPTIONThe graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...rved in the first 60 years of the given period of time. After that while, the USA remained con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84895833333 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55384186862 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614583333333 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.6867739967 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204975919343 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929029730683 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798235011036 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129148734119 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906634039511 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.