The bar graph illustrates the aggregated amount of sustainable energy with regards to the total energy production in Australia, Germany, Norway and Iceland in three years; 2000, 2004 and 2007.
Overall, it can be observed that Norway stored the most amount of renewable energy than others, followed by Iceland, while Australia’s was the least in the three examined years. Iceland witnessed a relative stability in the total sustainable energy capacity over the seven-year period.
In 2000, the percentage of environmentally-sound energy with respect to the entire amount of produced energy in Norway was just over 60 %; while the corresponding generation for Australia was calculated to be roughly 8 %. In the following years, the Norwegians’ energy production experienced an upward trend to its highest level, at approximately 78 %; however the renewable energy storage capacity of Australia almost remained fairly static at about 10 % in 2004 and 2007.
In 2000, the total energy amount provided by means of sustainable energy generation in Iceland, at over 50%, was approximately 5 folds greater than Germany’s. From 2000 onwards, Iceland’s sustainable energy amount witnessed up-and-down trend and hit its highest point at roughly 60%, while the Germans’ renewable energy production saw a significant rise to the number of approximately 18 % by the end of 2007.
- In the past knowledge was contained in books Nowadays knowledge is uploaded to the internet Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 95
- Schools should stop using books for teaching and instead use films TV and computers Do you agree or disagree with this statement 93
- At present the mass media is very influential and the lives of many people are affected by the news Why do you think this is happening Is this a positive or negative development 89
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concerts between 2010 and 2015 84
- There are more and more effective security measures in large cities to reduce the crime Does this endeavour bring more benefits than problems 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...static at about 10 % in 2004 and 2007. In 2000, the total energy amount provided ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1166.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55238095238 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21837611771 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538095238095 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.9239309583 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.571428571 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265378276006 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144759123799 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673629657683 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193569360728 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637953995657 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.2329268293 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 61.2550243902 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.