The chart compares the amounts of products shipped using four means of transport in th UK druing 1974 and 2002.
It is clear that rood was by far the most popular type of transportation, while pipeline carried the smallest amount of goods. Additionally, the total quantities of products transported in England increased during the research period.
In 1974, the amount of goods shipped using road systems was highest among four types of transport, at around 70 million tonnes. The figures for water and rail were significantly lower, at merely 40 million tonnes of products each means, whereas only less than 5 million tonnes of goods used pipeline.
During 1990, the road's figure had a 10 rise to around 80 million tonnes. While the total quantity of products transported by ships increased to nearly 60 million tonnes, the number for rail declined to only 35 million tonnes. In 2002, road still was the most widely used mean of transport, at almost 100 million tonnes, compared to the lowest number in the graph of pipeline, at just over 20 million tonnes of goods.
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 79
- The diagram below contain information regarding the percentage of people occupied in various type of position in 1999 and 2001 50
- Comparison of car theft 73
- The bar chart below shows the reasons for internet usage among British adults(2001) 61
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95027624309 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54524096691 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591160220994 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5156215629 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137972072013 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740995202031 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06327617281 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105398022668 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497962619229 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.