The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.
The bar graphs show the main purposes why students studying by different age groups and the percentage of them get supported from their employers.
It is clear that student tend to study for their interests more as they get older, while the percentage for career pupose shows contradiction. Additionally, employees under 26 years old are more likely to receive help from their bosses than other age groups.
80% of respondents under 26 choose career as their main purpose of studying, compared to only 10% of students study for interest. However, this trend tends to change when students get older. In the group of students aged from 40 to 49, students equally vote for career and interest as the reasons they studying, at 40% respectively. There are 70% of students aged over 49 choose interest as their main purpose of studying, while career is only chosen by almost 20% of students.
It is interesting to note that almost 65% of students aged under 26 received help from their employers while studying, while the proportion of 30-39 age group is significantly lover, at only around 30%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | happyhappy | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | rahulsd | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | lordwind | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | lordwind | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | noor salah | 73 | view |
- Accomodation and transport problems are increasing in many large cities. Businesses are encouraged to move to rural areas . Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages ? 67
- The table shows the percentage of workers in agriculture manufacturing and services in 7 European countries in 2014 71
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in differnt countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisos where relevant 81
- The charts below show the number of girls per 100 boys in all levels of education 88
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... tend to study for their interests more as they get older, while the percentage fo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97282608696 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62867687397 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554347826087 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8050183399 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.375 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344398659747 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16735227788 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103625874364 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239359558442 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0905216022664 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.