The line graph illustrates four different methods of transport used for importing goods in the UK from 1974 to 2002.
According to the graph, the amount of goods transported in Britain by roadways was about 70 million tonnes which was nearly 30 million tonnes more than the goods transported using rail and waterways. Then, it increased gradually with some fluctuations reaching just under 100 million ronnes. In case of goods transported by railway, it remained constant at 40 million tonnes from 1974 to 2002 and soared slightly with some oscillations to just over 40 million tonnes.
Similarly, in 1974, waterways transported around 40 million tonnes goods whereas approximately 5 million tonnes goods was imported in Britain utilizing pipeline. The goods transported in Britain by waterways rose slowly from 1974 to 1978 and upsurged rapidly until 1982 at slightly under 60 million tonnes. This then, went up mildly ending at slightly over 60 million tonnes in 2002. Likewise, goods imported by pipeline uplifted tediously reaching nearly 20 million tonnes at the end of the period.
Overall, the road was the most used mode of transport in Britain while the least mode of transport was pipeline from 1974 to 2002. The goods transported by water and railways was same in the year of 1975.
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade - labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, make comparisons where relevant. 61
- IELTS 10 Test 3 Writing Task 1 - Academic 11
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 56
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 67
- The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, similarly, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1090.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14150943396 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64438859263 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495283018868 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0124980475 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310029967136 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1521650724 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117323056089 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257682146827 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108522228092 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.