The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given line chart illustrates how the amounts of goods transported which are road, water, rail, pipeline varied in the UK from 1974 and 2002.

to begin with, it is clearly seen that the most popular transport in UK was road according to the chart. It has been growing gradually until 1994 and there was a steep increase in 1998. In addition, the second highest figure of transport was water. At the beginning in 1974, it was lower than rail, however it had expanded by approximately 58 dramatically between period 1979 and 1982. Eventually, it accounted for the second highest rank in the end of chart. The number of rail had been following the next, and it had taken at around 40 in 2002. Besides, the lowest figure was pipeline. The figure of pipeline in 1974 was almost 2, and it had been growing slightly until 2002.

In conclusion, the road was the most popular goods transported in UK, and the water, rail, pipeline had been following respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-03 Sang Sang Sang 73 view
2024-03-03 Sang Sang Sang 73 view
2023-07-18 cookie12 78 view
2023-06-10 taocute.s1 74 view
2023-06-09 Roy An 11 view
Essays by user ansgusn :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...varied in the UK from 1974 and 2002. to begin with, it is clearly seen that the...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, second, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7380952381 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57264080774 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3579974659 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136216507774 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596055483781 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523783474063 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122293901329 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315373830409 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.