The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.

The graph provides information about the rates of transported goods by several ways of transportation in the UK among 28 years from 1974 to 2002.

As the graph illustrates using road and pipe line were increased gradually between 1974 and 1978 and reached to approximate levels of 5 and 70 respectively. In comparison, road way was shown gradual decrease in 1982, but pipeline was risen to about 20. Then, both of them hit the highest point during 1994 and 1998.

On the other hand, both water and rail modes were indicated the same level by almost 40 at the beginning of the period up to 1978. While, water method was shown a dramatic rise in 1982; in comparison, rail transport suddenly dipped and reached to about 35. Afterwards, in two ways of transportation, a partial fluctuation was seen to 2002.

Overall, among varied modes of transport in the UK, road and pipeline were contributed as the most and the least ways in these years. However, there were sensible changes in four modes which cause variation among them.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-30 leanhtu11 89 view
2020-01-21 PsycRicky 56 view
2020-01-16 Raksadil 73 view
2020-01-16 Adilrahi 73 view
2020-01-12 kaka singh 78 view
Essays by user sepideh 63 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he highest point during 1994 and 1998. On the other hand, both water and rail m...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, then, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84745762712 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7033175108 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61581920904 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6054138679 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244308489013 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924406919603 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102459054332 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163616264441 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114571442381 0.0819641961636 140% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.