The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph describes Europe's expenditure on fish and some various kinds of meat over a period of 25
Overall, it is clear that the figure of chicken has an inclination for increasing to reach the highest point while the other slowly decline specifically the consumption of fish accounts for the lowest point during the period shown.
In 1979, the figure for beef accounted for approximately 220 grams, which was being higher than other's figures. In terms of chicken and lamb, two of which had roughly the equal figure, at around 150 grams and exactly 50 grams respectively. Regarding fish's consumption, the figure of fish started at approximately 50 grams being the lowest consumption.
In the period between 1979 and 2004, the consumption of fish fluctuated solely slightly and after that reaching to around 40 grams eaten; while the other of the figure had dramatically fluctuant. In terms of lamb and chicken, the figure of lamb declined to approximately 60 grams compared to the consumption of chicken reaching a peak of around 250 grams in 2004. Regarding beef's eaten, the line tended to the decrease roundly 10 grams in 2004 despite leading the way with 200 grams in 1979
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arious kinds of meat over a period of 25 Overall, it is clear that the figure of ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9648241206 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73436105619 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547738693467 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.8650486556 43.030603864 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.142857143 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11701276223 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585059613332 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411567460349 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0799957514384 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409763454413 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.