The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009
The given line graph shows the data about change in the price of fresh fruits and vegetables, sugar and sweets, and carbonated drinks over a thirty year period in the US between 1979 and 2009. The graph also shows the consumer-price index during this time.
Overall, it is clear that the trend of price change was gradually increased in most of product groups, except one. The exception is fresh fruits and vegetables which shows dramatic rise from roughly 60 in 1979 to over 300 in thirty years later.
All this lines on the graph have the same starting figure at 60% in 1979, the consumer-price index rose steadily to over 200 in 2009. Prices for sugar and sweets and carbonated drinks showed similar trends. Although their prices also rose, they were consistently below the consumer price index average after 1987. After many minor fluctuations, the number for sugar and sweets was 200 on the graph in 2009, higher than the final figure for carbonated drinks at 150.
Price rose sharply for fresh fruits and vegetables, particularly after 1989. From the same figure of about 60 at the start of the period, the prices finished at roughly 330 on the index in 2009.
- Academic IELTS Writing task 1 Sample 103 - Quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 86
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 84
- Writing, reading and maths are the three major subjects. Some people think that computer skills should be added as a fourth subject. What extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 78
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems to increase the costs of fuels. Do you agree or disagree??? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich shows dramatic rise from roughly 60 in 1979 to over 300 in thirty years late...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81683168317 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36843293368 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524752475248 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3261302575 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 5.23603664747 15% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.442219923495 0.215688989381 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185469702594 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13249977942 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271460883312 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134145175812 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.