The graph below shows total Internet users in Vietnan from 2003 to the second quarter 2012.
The given bar graph depicts, the Internet users were in Vietan between 2003 -2012year.
According to the given graph, lots of people users were in the Internet 2012 year and the lowest people users were in 2003. On the other hand year by year was gradually increase Internet users. And from 2011-2012 year was shown approximately same quantity and the on the one hand between 2008-2009 year was represented faction roughly same. Obviously, the lowest users were presented in 2003. It was 3.1 million. Conversely, in 2010 year shown quantity over quarter. In 2012 year was higher than others. Year by year was rised plus three or four million. Overall, most of people users were Internet in 2012 year. And the lowest users were in 2003. Middle of the people's were used the Internet in 2007. It was shown under twenty. And the highest users were presented under a half. It was 31.2 million.
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.Do yoy agree or disagree? 56
- The bar chart below shiws the global sales of television by supervision incorporataion from 1999 2012 84
- The graph below gives information about the main purposes of overseas residents visit in the uk between 200 2016 36
- The line graph below show the population size birth and death rate of ENgland and Whales from 1700 to 2000 70
- The graph below shows average co2 emission per person in the United Kingdom,Sweden , Italy and Protugal between 1967- 2007. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'increased'.
Suggestion: increased
...e other hand year by year was gradually increase Internet users. And from 2011-2012 year...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...ed plus three or four million. Overall, most of people users were Internet in 2012 year. And t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 738.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79220779221 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27576791034 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 74.0 106.607317073 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480519480519 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 206.1 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 10.0 22.4926829268 44% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7854375661 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 49.2 112.824112599 44% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.2666666667 22.9334400587 45% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.93333333333 5.23603664747 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209491099905 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868663890088 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789179123906 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198693070434 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141968803147 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.3 13.2329268293 48% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.71 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 3.7 10.3012195122 36% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.02 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.9970731707 55% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.