The chart below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the parkway hotel how the rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010
The pie charts depict the same questionaire given 100 guests and asked visitors how parkway hotel's customer servicr between 3005-2010.
According to the graphs, in 2005 year lots of visitors (45%) were told satisactory and the lowest customers were said excellent (5%). In 2010 year was visitors were said good(39%) and touched the lowest point very poor (4%). In 2005 year some visitors were said poor and very poor (21%,15%). In 2010 year visitors were said very poor (4%) devided three very poor (12%). From 2005 and 2010 visitora were told differnet answers and they given oppose result. In conclusion, in 2005 year guests were result satisactotsatisactory and in 2010 year was result good. And in 2005vthe lowest peoples were said excellent and in 2010 year was said very poor. It srems clear that , in 2010 year was customer service good in parkway hotel than 2005 year. This two pie charts shown different result in different years.
- The bar chart below shiws the global sales of television by supervision incorporataion from 1999- 2012. 56
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society.To what extent do you agree? 73
- Sime people say that leisure time is important for having a good life while other belive that money is important Do you agree or disagree 48
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spread from 191. - 2007 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s were said poor and very poor 21%,15%. In 2010 year visitors were said very poor ...
^^
Line 3, column 518, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...were result satisactotsatisactory and in 2010 year was result good. And in 2005vt...
^^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: '2005vthe the lowest'.
Suggestion: 2005vthe the lowest
...d in 2010 year was result good. And in 2005vthe lowest peoples were said excellent and in 2010...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 654, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... was said very poor. It srems clear that , in 2010 year was customer service good ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 771.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91082802548 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49258634772 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503184713376 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.2559669762 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.1 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331886687437 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163378112893 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113105486173 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.333445653474 0.15604864568 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838983547586 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.69 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.