The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999.
The line chart illustrates the percentage of unemployment in the United States and Japan from March 1993 to March 1999.
Overall, it can be seen that the percentage of the US unemployment which was decreased and rates of Japan unemployment increased all over the period.
Looking at the graph in more detail, it is evident that the percentage of Japan unemployment which was 2.5 % in the starting year.Rates of Japan unemployment increased from 3.7 % in March 1994 to more than 4% in March 1996.Japan unemployment rates was almost 4.5% in March 1997. The percentage of unemployment which was exact 4.5 in March 1998 and it increased to 5% in the final year.
Turning to the remaining data sets, it can be seen that the percentage of US unemployment 7.0 % in the first year, which was the highest un employment in the graph.Whereas, rates of unemployment decrease from 6.3 % in March 1994 to 5.5 % in March 1996. Similarly, the USA unemployment rate s decreased to 5.2% in the next year.The percentage of American unemployment which was similar 5% in the last 2 years.
- the graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 75
- Thr graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emission person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 in 2007. 73
- In some countries and increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. 61
- nowadays people live in the society where consumer goods are cheaper to buy .do you think its advantage of outweigh disadvantage? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 131, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Rates
...nt which was 2.5 % in the starting year.Rates of Japan unemployment increased from 3....
^^^^^
Line 9, column 224, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Japan
...arch 1994 to more than 4% in March 1996.Japan unemployment rates was almost 4.5% in M...
^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reased to 5% in the final year. Turning to the remaining data sets, it c...
^^^^
Line 17, column 165, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Whereas
... the highest un employment in the graph.Whereas, rates of unemployment decrease from 6....
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 165, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the highest un employment in the graph.Whereas, rates of unemployment decrease from 6....
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 328, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...te s decreased to 5.2% in the next year.The percentage of American unemployment whi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, similarly, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95604395604 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04654241508 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.1888282862 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.333333333 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405116057257 0.215688989381 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.244826851143 0.103423049105 237% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10483575985 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289977735815 0.15604864568 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759419393229 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.