The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010

Essay topics:

The graph below shows US consumers' average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010.

The graph illustrates the US consumer's average cost on the phone call services of 10 years period.

Overall, at an early age in the US, the cost of residential phone service was more than the cost of cell phone service. Day by day with modernization people shifted towards cell phone service. So the cost of cell phone service increased.

Firstly, people of a few years back used residential phone services, because at that time cell phone services were not popular. At that time in 2001, the cost of residential services was about $700 , where the cost of cell phone services was only $200. Day by day with modernization cell phone services become famous than residential phone services. In 2006 their cost on services become same, which was about $560. After coming to the same place the cost of residential phone service gradually decreased, & the cost on cell service gradually increased. In 2010 the cost on cell phone services was about $730. And the cost on residential phone services was $400.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-24 Nicholas To 73 view
2022-08-08 eyraen 73 view
2022-08-08 eyraen view
2022-06-17 Thái Ly 67 view
2022-04-10 Đ view
Essays by user Sajid1410 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y age in the US, the cost of residential phone service was more than the cost of ...
^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ost of residential services was about 00 , where the cost of cell phone services w...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85882352941 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58769919585 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447058823529 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4834350665 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.0909090909 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4545454545 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395433095288 0.215688989381 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.216664912066 0.103423049105 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746825389932 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312902104863 0.15604864568 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0139787615516 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.15 8.06136585366 76% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.