The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010

Essay topics:

The graph below shows US consumers' average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010.

The line graph illustrates the amount of annualy expenditure on cell phone and residential phone services in the UK over a decade.

It is , overall , clear that ,throughout the period, there was a clear gradual decline in the quantity of expendtiure in residential phone services , while the figure for cell phone services increased dramaticaly to hit the its peak.

Focsuning on between 2001 and 2006 , the amount of expenditure in residential phone services stood at around $700 , although the quantity for cellphone services was $200 ; it was the lowest amount of expenditure in every each year.the amount for residential phone services has started decreasing steadily , whereas the amount of expenditure for celll phone service rose significantly; both the figure came across with other in 2006 , with about $550.

As for until 2010 , the amount for residential phone services declined to around $450 at the end of the given period , while the figure for cell phone services saw a dramatic growth and it reached ithe peak which accounted for roughly $750 in 2010.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-24 Nicholas To 73 view
2022-08-08 eyraen 73 view
2022-08-08 eyraen view
2022-06-17 Thái Ly 67 view
2022-04-10 Đ view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 6, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rvices in the UK over a decade. It is , overall , clear that ,throughout the pe...
^^
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the UK over a decade. It is , overall , clear that ,throughout the period, ther...
^^
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... decade. It is , overall , clear that ,throughout the period, there was a clear...
^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...xpendtiure in residential phone services , while the figure for cell phone service...
^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'its'?
Suggestion: the; its
...e services increased dramaticaly to hit the its peak. Focsuning on between 2001 and ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...k. Focsuning on between 2001 and 2006 , the amount of expenditure in residentia...
^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ential phone services stood at around 00 , although the quantity for cellphone ser...
^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...services has started decreasing steadily , whereas the amount of expenditure for c...
^^
Line 5, column 428, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he figure came across with other in 2006 , with about 50. As for until 2010 , t...
^^
Line 7, column 18, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...06 , with about 50. As for until 2010 , the amount for residential phone servic...
^^
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...around 50 at the end of the given period , while the figure for cell phone service...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14534883721 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8318033143 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529069767442 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 22.4926829268 191% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 113.699989006 43.030603864 264% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 221.25 112.824112599 196% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.0 22.9334400587 187% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354014567597 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.256333675082 0.103423049105 248% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649638175647 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256333675082 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649638175647 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.3 13.2329268293 184% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 61.2550243902 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.1 10.3012195122 195% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.48 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.9970731707 175% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.