The graph gives information about the age of the population of Iceland between 1990 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The bar chart compares the age distribution of Iceland's population for each decade from 1990 to 2020. The five age groups are: children 0-14, young adults 15-24, two middle age groups, 25-54 and 55-64 and seniors over 64.
Overall, the population was concentrated in the 25-54 age group, and that concentration increased with each decade. Between 1990 and 2020, the relative number in the two oldest groups changed little, but the two youngest groups fell substantially.
In detail, the 25-54 age group rose steadily and stepwise from about one-third to nearly half of the population. In 1990, the age groups were rather evenly distributed, with the two oldest groups combined making up about a quarter, and the other three ranging between 21% and 32% each. The distribution became increasingly uneven with each decade. The two oldest groups did not change much; it was still nearly a quarter in 2020. In contrast, the two youngest groups decreased from 47% to 24%, with the young adult group falling the most, from slightly more than one in five to less than one in ten.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-01 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 78 | view |
2022-11-28 | jena_03 | 67 | view |
2022-09-05 | mary.ssherr | view | |
2022-09-02 | mary.ssherr | 89 | view |
2021-12-12 | dhananjaydeej | 56 | view |
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 84
- The graph gives information about the age of the population of Iceland between 1990 and 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'ranging' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'ranges'.
Suggestion: ranges
...up about a quarter, and the other three ranging between 21% and 32% each. The distribut...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, still, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95580110497 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49040771403 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569060773481 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.381663215 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124497184771 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638276148605 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533622755208 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102794962973 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235700111406 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.