The graph gives information about the consumption of fast food (in grams per week), in the UK from 1970 to 1990.
The line graph illustrates the amount of hamburger, fish and chips and pizza consumed weekly in the UK between 1970 and 1990.
Overall, the consumption of hamburger and fish and chips experienced an upward trend, while the pizza consumption declined. Although pizza had the highest intakes in 1970, it approached the lowest at the end of the period.
Fish and chips consumption showed the most dramatic increase, rising from 80 grams to 500 grams per week, a nearly ninefold increase. Followed by hamburger, the amount of hamburger was consumed went from slightly 40 grams to 300 grams, which was a sevenfold increase. In 1990, the consumption of fish and chips was nearly double that of hamburgers, with 500 grams and 300 grams respectively.
In 1970, pizza had the highest intake per week, with 300 grams while hamburger and fish and chips had about 3 times less than pizza. However, there is a modest drop in the pizza consumption to 200 grams, and it remained unchanged in the last 10 years.
- The graph gives information about the consumption of fast food in grams per week in the UK from 1970 to 1990 73
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include 73
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with that statement 73
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92352941176 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61748842877 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517647058824 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 10.810151479 43.030603864 25% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.625 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270853423291 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121846884321 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692138081847 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165285464062 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541204923942 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.