The graph gives information about the percentage of the population if four different Asian countries living in cities between 1970 and 2020 with additional predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature

Essay topics:

The graph gives information about the percentage of the population if four different Asian countries living in cities between 1970 and 2020 with additional predictions for 2030 and 2040.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the urban demographic feature of four different countries in Asia over a period of fifty years, starting from 1970 and forecasts its changes in 2030 and 2040.

Generally, the common trend of the urban population's percentage is upward. However, while Malaysia and Indonesia's figures grew remarkably, those of the Philipines and Thailand experienced some fluctuations. Meanwhile, over the period shown, Malaysia maintained its position as the nation with the highest proportion of city population.

In 1970, people living in urban areas accounted for 30% of Malaysians, which is around 16% higher than that of Indonesia. In the following years, both countries witnessed a noticeable increase in the percentage of city dwellers, especially at the end of the period. Therefore, in 2040, urban residents are expected to become a greater part of the national population when their percentage might reach its peak of nearly 84% in Malaysia and over 60% in Indonesia.

Regarding other nations, 31% of the Philipines’s population lived in developed places while under a fifth of Thailands were city dwellers in 1970. However, after a rise in 1990, the figure of the Philipines decreased to over 40% in 2010. Besides, the proportion of Thailand’s population living in cities remained stable over 30 years, followed by a rise in 2020. Finally, both nations received positive predictions in terms of their city population’s percentage in 2030 and 2040.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-05-13 duongpt 73 view
2024-02-23 Elahe13 78 view
2023-08-15 Phuong0410 view
2023-08-15 Phuong0410 view
2023-08-15 Phuong0410 61 view
Essays by user lalo :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'populations'' or 'population's'?
Suggestion: populations'; population's
...enerally, the common trend of the urban populations percentage is upward. However, while Ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1253.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40086206897 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00867935423 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599137931034 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0776944085 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.909090909 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229627608198 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859269423953 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059364817579 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141045152397 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049559854066 0.0819641961636 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.