The graph gives information about the percentage of the population of four different Asian countries living in cities between 1970 and 2020 with additional predictions for 2030 and 2040.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The line chart illustrates the percentage of city population of four Asia countries between 1970 and 2020, with the projection extending to 2040.
Overall, the proportion of four nations residing in cities witnessed an upward trend over the period. Malaysia anticipated to have the highest urban population, followed by Indonesia, and Thailand is expected to have the smallest urbanization growth.
Indonesia began with the lowest percentage of city population, around 15% with 2 times less than Malaysia. The projection is that the proportion of Indonesia city population will have soared sharply by 4 times, and it is recorded to be the second highest urbanization growth. Nearly 82% is assumed to surge in the percentage of Malaysian urban population in 2040, which surpass Thailand and Philippines.
It is forecasted that the percentage of Thailand urban population will experience a modest growth from around 18% to 48%, which is 30% lower than Malaysia. The proportion of Philippines metropolis population fluctuated with the downward tendency, then Philippines and Indonesia shared the same percentage of city population at around 42% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-13 | duongpt | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-23 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Phuong0410 | view | |
| 2023-08-15 | Phuong0410 | view | |
| 2023-08-15 | Phuong0410 | 61 | view |
- the diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 78
- The graph gives information about the percentage of the population of four different Asian countries living in cities between 1970 and 2020 with additional predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 words 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50561797753 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02800129115 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544943820225 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2710098865 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188616895208 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954153868532 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877522734964 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14495536368 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101475773057 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.