The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The picture depicts how the horse has evolved for 40 million years to better adapt to its survival conditions.
In general, the modern horse has undergone continuous growth in size to get its current shape with the recent horse appearing to be the most feathery species. Moreover, there has been a simplification in foot structure in the horse’s evolution.
40 years ago, the horse’s ancestor- Eohippus had feet which consisted of five toes with the fifth toe off the ground. Additionally, the shortest tail and the smallest body were also seen in this breed. However, 10 million years later, the horse, which was now called Mesohippus, had developed to show signs of a mane. At the same time, the five-toe foot had transformed into a three-toe one.
Living about 15 million years ago, Merychippus developed from Mesohippus to have a larger body shape and become similar to the modern-day horse. Furthermore, Merychippus run on three toes with a protruding middle toe. After several variations, the current horse species has its three toes combined into a single hoof, a discernible mane along its long neck and the longest tail.
- The bar chart shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011 The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one person households 89
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001 84
- The diagram shows a museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09042553191 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72200658118 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643617021277 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7693248276 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136535726254 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055519765551 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488866692312 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0911402748177 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305100584222 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.