The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Australia between 1995 and 2005.
The line graph indicates how much money paid out for books in four different countries, including Germany, France, Italy and Austria from 1995 to 2005.
In general, it is clear that the four countries showed an upward trend in 2005 while the allocation of books was the highest for Germany in different periods.
In 1995, the most significant figure in spending books was Germany, which accounted for 80 million, followed by France, Italy and Austria with the figures standing at 55, 50, and 30 million respectively. After Germany continued its rising trend in 1999, they witnessed a downward trend at 85 million in 2003 before reaching a peak of nearly 100 million in 2005.
In the remaining countries regard as France, Italy and Austria. The figure for France showed a steady growth in the following years, which stayed at 75 million in 2005. Likewise, Austria rose moderately from 1995 to 2001, then it made a great stride in later years and accounted for over 70 million in 2005. However, in the case of Italy, it witnessed a fluctuating increase from 55 million in 1997 to about 60 million in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-01 | Phạm Phú Trường | 78 | view |
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governmets must invest this money in public services instead. 61
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012. 73
- International travel is becoming cheaper and cheaper, and more countries are now opening their doors to foreign visitors. Do you think that the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- the graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufactures to produce vehicles 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84210526316 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51625738877 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584210526316 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1820670078 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244116683241 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116223000704 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886732191166 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171717316273 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893729961831 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.