The graph shows the number of minutes of three types of phone calls in Australia between 1992-2000.
Summarise the information in the charts and make comparisons where appropriate.
The line chart illustrates the daily duration of telephone calls in minutes which have been categorized into three different groups. And, this data had been gathered from Australia between 1992 to 2000.
In general, local phone calls have been made mostly throughout the whole 8- year period and fluctuated around 80 million minutes. On the other hand, other types of communication are less popular but had an upward trend in those years.
Back in the year 1992, local calls start at around 70 million minutes and increased slightly and peaked in the year 1996 around 82 million minutes. Also, long distance phone calls were a little above 30 million minutes in 1992 and went up steadily to 50 million minutes in the year 2000. At last, some calls have been made with mobile devices which had a duration of about 1 million minutes in the beginning and rose up slowly to 10 million minutes per day in the year 1996.
There are no significant changes in the trend of long distance calls after the year 1996, but the minutes of local call start to decline after this year and ended up on 70 million minutes in 2000. Conversely, mobile call times begin to increase faster and reach 40 million minutes in the year 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-27 | cocolico14 | 47 | view |
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. 78
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today's world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion. 56
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevent. 11
- The graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in wealthy countries, countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, so, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7476635514 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25041605804 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523364485981 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9824520887 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.888888889 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202141826089 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101572743206 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446124542764 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13610584379 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505457887768 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.