Many people are working at home rather than in the workplace. Some people believe this will bring benefits to the workers and their families, but others suggest it will cause stress in the home. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Working in the offices had been common for the past decades. However, nowadays there is an alternative approach to work which is working in our own homes. This change has brought advantages such as workers having more flexible work hours and this would benefit the environment as well. On the other hand, there are some downsides which are distraction caused by the others in the house and reduction in productivity.
Focusing on the bright side, employees have more freedom to chose when to work. In result, they can manage their time more efficiently and spend quality time with their families. Additionally, this would help the environment by reducing the amount of energy required in workplaces and offices. Also, employees don't need to drive to their work, hence, there would be less exhaust fume emission in the air.
Conversely, there are some disadvantages to this method. First, the atmosphere in homes is not intended for working. We can be easily distracted by so many little things such as noises produced by other members of the family, or children playing in the back yard. The second issue is that employees might be less productive since they are far away from their coworkers and peers. Not being able to help colleagues during the work process may introduce redundancies and a lot of other major problems such as poor coordination between coworkers and not doing the task on time.
In summary, I think that there should be a balance between these two approaches, such that it would enhance the advantages and reduce the effect of issues that have been addressed. The best way to solve this is to take a hybrid approach which is working at home for a few days and work in the office for the rest of the week. With this method, we can get the best of both worlds.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-11 | ratish singla | 56 | view |
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevent. 11
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas. 11
- Whoever controls the media also controls opinions and attitudes of the people and there is little that can be done to rectify this. 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organisation Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...workplaces and offices. Also, employees dont need to drive to their work, hence, the...
^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., we can get the best of both worlds.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, hence, however, may, second, so, well, i think, in summary, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81877022654 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53379251783 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576051779935 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7649206123 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0625 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181799811003 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586901554564 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03350597589 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109673488204 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023743894415 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.