the graph shows the production of main fuels in the UK between 1986 to 2000.
The line diagram illustrates the number changed in the production of petroleum, coal and natural gas in Britain from 1986 to 2000. The number of petroleum showed some fluctuations and a mainly upward tendency. By contrast, the one for coal also experienced some fluctuations but presented a roughly downward tendency. Besides, the number of natural gas kept stable until 1995, after which it steadily increased.
As can be seen from the chart that the petroleum industry always the most productive industry among the given three cohorts. Although the number of it peaked at 140 tones in 1991, it dropped to the same number as one in initiate year. Then it picked again and steeply increased to 150 tonnes in the year 2000. Conversely, the figure for the coal constantly dropped from 110 tones though it slightly rose again from 1991 to 1995. However, it continued to fell and ended up with 60 million tonnes.
As for one for gas, it is easily noticed that the data always remained at 60 million tones until 1995. Suddenly, it went through a significant increase and reached the highest point which was doubled for one in coal in the year 2000.
- Some people believe that only students with the best academic performance should be rewarded, while some other people think it is more important to reward students with improvement. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- the graph shows the percentage of people using the internet for different activities in a UK city between 2003 to 2006. 61
- the diagram shows how an office building looks at the present and the plan for its further development 63
- the diagrams below show the process of applying for a driver license in America 78
- The chart below shows the rate of males and females who were overweight in Austalia from 1980 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 413, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...995, after which it steadily increased. As can be seen from the chart that the pet...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, conversely, however, if, so, then, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81725888325 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51682477885 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573604060914 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.556767264 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.2727272727 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0955448933029 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398120158642 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544604120211 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0639915180307 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428877637616 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.