the table describes the changes in people who went for international travel in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005.
the table illustrates the changes in people who went for international travel in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005.
Asia and the Pacific underwent a substantial upward trend, rising from 60.2 million in1990 to 135.8 million in 2005. They experienced the fastest increasing rate(approximately 125%) among all these areas. America had a similar trend, except for a slight dip in 2005. The number of people who choose to take international travel in Europe is on the top of this list, accounting for more than half of the total number. The general stable around 400 million between 1995 and 2005.
On the contrary, the number for Africa and Middle East leg behind all the other areas. Although they all kept an upward tendency, the number of people choosing international travel is no more than 30 million 2005.
The general trend for the total areas is on the rise, surging from 448.9 to 693.7.
- the diagrams below show the process of applying for a driver license in America 78
- Young people who commit serious crimes such as a rubbery or a violent attack should be punished in the same way as adults.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- the graph shows the production of main fuels in the UK between 1986 to 2000. 78
- the diagram shows how an office building looks at the present and the plan for its future development 57
- Young people who commit serious crimes such as a rubbery or a violent attack should be punished in the same way as adults To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the table illustrates the changes in people...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, except for, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 736.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87417218543 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61283247785 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582781456954 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 206.1 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2073451602 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7777777778 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392270636183 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170861676619 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.249601232076 0.0843802449381 296% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.311201418092 0.15604864568 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.320707175309 0.0819641961636 391% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.