the charts showe the percentage of male and female students getting top graded in 1960 and 2000.
The two bar charts prove how many students in two genders got high scores in five different subjects in the year 1996 and 2002. The number of students gained high score in science and maths both showed a downward trend while one for Arts and Humanities were opposite and one for language kept stable. By contrast, the figure for female chart presented a completely different trend.
It can be seen from the male chart that the percentage for Science and Maths decreased from 34% and 30% to 18% and 17% respectively from 1996 to 2000. At the same time, students study at Humanities achieved a huge progress, which was almost doubled and ended up with around 44%, far more than the other cohorts. The number of Arts also increased and reached the highest point(22%) which was the same with Humanities’s number in 1996. However, the data for language kept stable.
When it comes to the female chart, the students majored at Science made little progress which mainly reached 11% in 2000. Moreover, the figure for Maths increased to 15% in 2000 which was triple-time for one in 1996. Conversely, one for language suffered an almost triple times fell in 2000 which fell to 30%. The percentage for Arts and Humanities from 30% and 34% both declined to 25% in 2000.
- the diagrams below show the process of applying for a driver license in America 78
- the diagram shows the process of how to make smoked fish Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 93
- Some people think computers and the Internet are more important in a child s education Others believe that schools and teachers are essential for children s learning Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The bar chart below shows the main reasons for students choosing to study at a particular university in the UK in 1985 and 2005 52
- the diagrams below show the process of applying for a driver license in America 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, however, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74090909091 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45327829244 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531818181818 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9431101618 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8181818182 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1719252706 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707312763766 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545256031245 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122304411352 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233349702556 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.