The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant
This graph illustrates the percentage of the process of recycling four materials which are not similar in the same country during 28 years.
The proportion of recycling alumininium cans accounted for approximately 5% in nineteen eighty six and began to rose gradually until comprised over forty by the end of the time frame. In 1990 the recycling of plastics appeared which presented a slight increase over the whole period and constituted 9% in 2010.
The figures for paper and card board and glass containers were fluctuated from the beginning of the period until 1994 in this year the proportion for paper reached a peak while the number of glass containers constituted 50% then the percentage of paper began to decrease steadily comprised seventy per cent by the end of the period. The number of glass containers climbed moderately from 50% in 1994 to 60% by the end of the period.
Over all, regarding to the graph the figure for all the four materials went up moderately but there was a slow decrease in paper and card board in the last sixteen years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r in the same country during 28 years. The proportion of recycling alumininium ...
^^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: eighty-six
...ounted for approximately 5% in nineteen eighty six and began to rose gradually until compr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 1994 to 60% by the end of the period. Over all, regarding to the graph the fig...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, regarding, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86263736264 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65350485827 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516483516484 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.5103009897 43.030603864 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.5 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12877808717 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697792388294 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411501362235 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877777399645 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417062927945 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.