The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant
This bar chart compares the proportion of recycled amounts of four
Different materials Paper& cardboard, Glass containers , and
Plastics
In the Early Eighties the total number of recycled Paper& cardboard and Glass containers Amounted to two thirds and half accordingly Paper& cardboard steadily
Increased in the next five years until it reached 70% and in the next five years it regained
It’s initial value of 60% while on the other hand Glass containers slightly decreased to 40%
in the Same decade then they both had a sudden raise form 65% and 40% to 80% and 50% in half a decade then in the next decade and half while Paper& cardboard steadily decreased numbering 70% Glass containers continued to increase totaling 60%
recycling of Alumininium cans didn’t start until the late Eighties and it was less than ten percent and Plastics started in the nineties and it came to a standstill of around 9% in two decades while spiked up from 5% to close to 50%
To sum up the data clearly shows that Paper& cardboard and Glass containers have Similar recycling rates from the start and Alumininium cans increased recently
And that Plastics are the lowest
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 55, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rials Paper& cardboard, Glass containers , and Plastics In the Early Eighties th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, still, then, third, while, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98979591837 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55428324692 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525510204082 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 196.0 22.4926829268 871% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 978.0 112.824112599 867% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 196.0 22.9334400587 855% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 72.0 5.23603664747 1375% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 9.0 3.83414634146 235% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0727675088296 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727675088296 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0407976550952 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460557234137 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 100.1 13.2329268293 756% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -110.54 61.2550243902 -180% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 77.4 10.3012195122 751% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.85 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 16.74 8.06136585366 208% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 52.0 11.4329268293 455% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 80.4 10.9970731707 731% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.