Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There has been a controversy on the university program, in which some people declare that students should be free to choose what they want to study, whereas some claim that university programs should only include the necessary subjects for their future. These perspectives will be discussed as follows.
On the one hand, each individual has unique talents that may differentiate them from the other, and because of that, demanding all students to learn the same subjects would not be appropriate for certain individuals to develop their capabilities. For example, some students may have a passion for arts, whose minds are creative and dreaming, and it will be non-practical if the university requires them to sign up for some science class that is more realistic and concise. Therefore, it is better if individuals can decide what they will learn at university.
On the other hand, with the significant development of technology these days, it is, certainly important to let the young generation catch up with the trend by incorporating useful subjects like science or technology in their study. In Vietnam, it is estimated that most companies require graduates to have certain knowledge regarding technology in order to support their jobs. Those careers namely teachers, officers or office administrators. It is recorded that in 2023, 83% of graduates in Vietnam with technology knowledge or certificates related to technology can find a job easier than others. For that reason, I think it is right to mark some particular subjects, such as technology, as compulsory for all university students because those are useful for them in the future. However, it should be noted that I dissent with the idea that all university students should be forced to learn necessary subjects for their future only.
In sum, it is crucial for students to follow their own will; however, it is also vital to incorporate some useful subjects that will assist the students in their future into the study program to make it more practical and beneficial for the students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-09 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | mary.ssherr | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 67 | view |
- Students are becoming more and more reliant on computers What are some of the problems associated with reliance on computers and what are some of the possible solutions 95
- International travel is becoming cheaper, and countries are opening their doors to more and more tourists. Do the advantages of increased tourism outweigh its disadvatages? 61
- The graphs below show information about electronic games in South Korea in 2003. 56
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 73
- Newspapers have an enormous influence on people’s ideas and opinions. Why? Is this a positive or negative situation? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, whereas, for example, i think, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15868263473 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85211190045 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526946107784 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.933213894 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.583333333 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367532915223 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129818434237 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790216311405 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225099307794 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737081170366 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.