The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by the level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.
The bar graphs show the percentage of computer ownership as the population in the period of eight years, from 2002 to 2018, and in terms of five different sections of education in the year 2002 and 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that computers' owners were more popular in the later years, also people who have higher education had a larger demand for purchasing a computer.
In the first bar graph, under 60% of computers were purchased in 2002, and this proportion increased to 60% in the next two years. Similarly, after having risen gradually in the percentage of computer owners in the next few years, this figure reaching a peak of approximately 70% at the end of the period.
In the second graph, no high school diploma students accounted for the lowest use of computers, which was around 15% in 2002 and just above 40% in the year 2010. In contrast, postgraduate students made up the highest percentage of computer owners in 2002 and 2010, at nearly 80% and around 92% respectively. 40% of high school students had their own computers in 2002, this figure increased by 15% when they attended college. Whereas, in 2010, around 90% of students owned computers in college and university, 20% higher than that of high school students.
- The pie chart shows spending for different purposed inJapan and Malaysia. Summarize, report the main features and make comoarison where relevant. 56
- The chart below give information about attendance at entertainment venues and admission prices to those venues in 2009 79
- The government should encourage industries and business to move out of big cities and into regional areas Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 74
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 78
- The chart below gives information about trends in Internet use by females in the USA in two years 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, similarly, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82710280374 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60640868493 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551401869159 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6783503051 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.125 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335572515593 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15230169794 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111621030932 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207497185349 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134761547131 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.