The graphs below show the development of Brindell from 1800 to 2000.
Summarize the key features and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps provide a clear overview of Brindell's evolvement from 1800 to 2000.
It is described under three milestones, specifically in 1800, 1900 and 2000. Although it is projected to be liveable, it still keeps the frame.
Starting with Brindell essence, in 1800, it was completely natural with no human artificial materials. However, just after a decade, farmland was replaced by
an industrial zone and a small village for workers called "Bun Hill". Simultaneously, the great amount of woodland was diminished for the larger of crops and River Stour. That is to say, animal habitats have been gradually lost.
A substantial difference between 1900 and 2000 mainly illustrates the expansion of human demands by which dwindling the square of woodland to reach a low record of less than a half. The remaining was constructed under a part for workers living there named "Bun Hill Park". Moreover, it is obvious to see the housing area and place for factories extended nearly twice, leading to narrow the land should have been recorded as a part of River Stour. The place called "Brindell" was also widened and ended up with a circular border.
To conclude, going along with the times, Brindell has a few certain changes. Nonetheless, it seems to me that humans are taking home out of animals abruptly
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-12 | Anne020304 | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Anne020304 | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Anne020304 | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Lynne Dao | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Lynne Dao | 11 | view |
- The picture below shows a hot balloon works The picture below shows a hot balloon works Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 78
- The graphs below show the development of Brindell from 1800 to 2000 Summarize the key features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The graphs below show the development of Brindell from 1800 to 2000 Summarize the key features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18433179724 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9525975327 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654377880184 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5836739074 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5384615385 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6923076923 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0927566289308 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382044185217 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592868075407 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0667949903428 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686490003699 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.