The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two line charts compare the commencing rates between local students and foreign students of universities across Australia in a period of time from 2001 to 2010. As can be seen from the charts, local students have always been outnumbered overseas students and the enrolment of overseas students is increasing over the years.

From 2001 to 2007, Australian universities have always seen a gradual increase in the total number of both local and overseas students. Starting at 400,000 for the former and 20,000 for the latter in 2001, the numbers have rised up to 600,000 and 60,000 respectively. Then, from 2007 to 2010, the total number of overseas students continued to climb up to 80,000 while that of local students remained the same at 600,000.

With regards to the new recruitment, there has been a high jump in the number of commencing students from overseas from over 10 thousands in 2001 to 40 thousands in 2009, which was then slowed down to just over 40 thousands in 2010. In contrast, the number of new local students has been fluctuated around 200 thousands over the 10-year period.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-20 trikhung777 73 view
2022-02-08 mrinal 73 view
2022-02-05 smiley 73 view
2022-02-03 thaodim123 73 view
2022-02-01 DRgio 84 view
Essays by user Sea153 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s of universities across Australia in a period of time from 2001 to 2010 As can be seen from t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81182795699 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5220097164 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47311827957 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 186.0 22.4926829268 827% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 895.0 112.824112599 793% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 186.0 22.9334400587 811% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 24.0 5.23603664747 458% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262852660261 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.262852660261 0.103423049105 254% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196990292662 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791480263126 0.0819641961636 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 94.2 13.2329268293 712% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -91.93 61.2550243902 -150% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 72.3 10.3012195122 702% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.8 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.41 8.06136585366 191% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 11.4329268293 481% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 76.4 10.9970731707 695% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 55.0 11.0658536585 497% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.